
In the cacophony of voices we find ourselves surrounded these days, it is difficult to place oneself in a specific bracket of tolerance in an absolute sense. “We are tolerant” “We are not tolerant” has become more like the rose-petal amusement akin to, ‘she loves me’, ‘she loves me not’. The tolerance rhetoric has been freely used rather like Tata namak and arguments from both sides are present in abundance – the question of why now and why not then and where were you when excreta have been made. Rewards returned and the said action being applauded and reprimanded and mocked at all in equal measure.
So the question really is have we become more intolerant as a society at large, have our ignition point – the point where one raises a voice, become low? Well it is definitely a matter of introspection. The bigger question therefore is: what is really at stake? Can we be led by arguments (well-articulated and researched in most cases) and be drifted away from the bigger and more real problems which face us. Can we afford to be tolerant against rising scarcity of food or global warming which can spell disaster for the entire race? Can we choose to ignore the burden of rising debt which our country has taken (past governments included) and unable to pay the interest being levied.
Can we choose to be tolerant when millions still sleep without one square meal a day or worst still when a child is deprived of basic sanitation and right to survive and thrive? Everything gets dwarfed in perspective. Yet, we choose tolerance as our answer to most of these problems. We choose to look away and concentrate on the crackling surface unaware of the molten lava which runs underneath. There is a saying in Hindi which says “Bhukhe Bhajan Na Hoy Gopala”, which means that a hungry man can not recite the name of the Lord. So can we really afford to be drifted and tolerant about the time and resources at our hand could have been used to really make an impact and a difference. As for religious tolerance I personally love to quote George Carlin who said “Religion is like a pair of shoes… Find one that fits for you, but don’t make me wear your shoes.”
So let’s be intolerant and raise our voice if we must but choose the issue carefully against which we must raise our voice. The future we will have will depend on what we choose to be tolerant towards.





Success as the world defines it, has many ingredients and sure-shot recipes and by now given the number of article and books we have been subjected to on the same topic, we should have memorized them by heart if not already. To name a few in the list we have hard-work topping the charts, followed by determination, courage, learning from failure, the fabled 10,000 hours of practice, and persistence to name a few. Yet, despite all the constituents, there is something more to it. Something which is most often over-looked, something which marks the initiation of that success or rather puts the person towards the fabled path.
Ownership and Responsibility are imperative in running a Democratic system, as is the political system and adult suffrage. In a country touted to be the oldest democracy, one of the main reasons for unequal growth can be attributed to the level of ownership citizens have in participating in the growth of the nation. Change can be driven effectively only when everyone takes part and pitches in to do their bit, rather than playing the blame game and talking in the comfort of their warm living rooms about the changes the government will bring.
